Milk has a great history of being used as food in human
history. And it hasn’t been much longer than milk has been questioned for its
nature. Is milk as healthy as it is believed or milk is just a white poison
that has been misunderstood for a long time.
To answer it exactly to the point. Well, Milk is not a poison. As
any baby is born, their life starts with the taste of mother milk.
And the nature of milk doesn’t vary from species to species.
There is some difference in the composition of nutrients of milk of different
animals including human as social animal. But the overall nature remains
somehow the same.
Milk- Is it Good or Bad for Health

Over a period of time milk has been in controversy. As medical science has developed so far some advocate about the necessity of milk in daily life while some research advocate about the pathogenic result of milk So, who's right? And
why are we drinking it anyway?
Milk is the basis of every mammal's diet after birth when our digestive systems are immature and small. Basically, it's power food to kick-start our bodies and helps us grow. Milk is rich in fat, vitamins, minerals, and milk-sugar: lactose. On top of that, for a while after birth, it also contains antibodies and proteins that protect us from infections and regulate our immune system.
But it's a lot of effort for mothers to produce.
Eventually, humans stop drinking mother's milk and transition to the diet of
their parents. This is how it's been for thousands of years. Until about eleven
thousand years ago, when our ancestors settled down in the first agricultural
communities.
Soon, they domesticated the first dairy animals: goats, sheep, and
cattle. They found that dairy animals are able to eat useless and abundant
stuff and turn it into nutritious and tasty food. This made a huge difference
in terms of survival, especially in hard times. So, groups that had milk
during the evolution phase had a decent advantage. And through natural selection, it
changed the genes of communities who consumed a lot of it.
This adaptation has to do with a specialized enzyme: lactase. Babies have a lot of it in their system, so they can break down the milk-sugar lactose and digest milk easily. But the older we grow, the fewer lactase enzymes our body produces.
Worldwide, about 65% of the population do not have the enzyme after infancy, which means they are not able to digest more than about 150 millilitres each day. This lactose intolerance is not spread evenly around the world, though. In some East Asian communities, for example, it's up to 90%.
In Northern Europe and North America, the rates are the lowest overall.
There are probably a few reasons for this uneven distribution. The trait was
first introduced by random mutation, which happened independently of each other
in a few populations. The fact that farming replaced hunting and gathering more
and more created natural-selection pressure. People who were able to digest
lactose had more foods at hand, which was an advantage.
The migration of dairy farmers to the north then spread it
further, which probably pushed back populations there that didn't have the
trait.
Why is Milk so controversial?
There are a number of claims regarding the negative and positive
health effects of milk. The negative ones cover a wide variety, from brittle
bones to cancer, and cardiovascular diseases to intolerance and allergies. Some
older studies found a connection between milk and a high risk of breast, colon,
and prostate cancer but meta amalyses found in milk have no impact on your cancer risk.
On the contrary, the calcium in milk might even have a protective effect against colon cancer. Although this could be calcium in general, it's not clear milk plays a role in this effect. Only studies on prostate cancer showed an increased risk for people who consumed more than one and a quarter litre of milk a day.
But again, the association is inconsistent and other
studies don't find any effects. We discuss these studies in more detail in our
sources document. All in all, the research seems to show that if you drink between
100 to 250 millilitres of milk per day, cancer is not a concern.
Similarly, meta-amalyses could not find any impact from milk or
dairy products on your risk of heart disease, stroke, or your total mortality.
Some studies even suggested that high blood pressure might be rarer in people
who eat a lot of dairy, although the evidence is not strong enough to claim
this with confidence.
The case gets more complicated though when we look at bones. A number of studies found neither positive nor negative effects for adults. There are hormones in milk, but only in very low concentrations.
For example to get
the same amount of hormones as from the pill, you'd need to drink about 5000 litres
of milk, and even if you did, most hormones would be destroyed by your
digestive system before they could affect you, which is the reason why so much
medication is coated to protect it from our digestion.
For pesticides and antibiotics, there are regulations in most parts of the world that only allow completely harmless amounts. Milk that surpasses these thresholds is not allowed to go on the shelf. So, there's nothing, in particular, to worry about.
Besides allergies and those suffering
from lactose intolerances, the best-known negative effects of milk are probably
acne and general discomfort after drinking milk or eating dairy products, and
here the effects are very real. For example, skim milk has been found to
statistically increase the rate of acne by 24%.
Allergies against milk products are especially prevalent among
children, with one in 18 kids in Germany suffering from them. In general, these
allergies tend to get better or disappear as they grow older.
Is Milk Healthy then?
Milk, no matter if it comes from mothers, cows, sheep, goats, or
camels is a nutrient-dense food. It contains all necessary macronutrients and
many micronutrients. Especially in regions where people struggle to get enough
calories, milk can contribute to a healthy life and lower child mortality.
For those living in the developed world, in general, milk is not
harmful if you are not allergic or intolerant to it. Especially for children,
it's a good way to get large amounts of calcium and for vegetarians, it's a
good source of vitamin B12 and B vitamins in general. This does not mean there are
no other alternatives with the same effect. You do not need to drink milk to be
healthy.
Milk is also definitely not
a substitute for water. Milk is a power food, and the additional calories from
drinking a lot of it on a regular basis can contribute to being overweight.
Especially flavoured milk or chocolate milk is more comparable to beverages like
lemonade than a healthy snack and there's another thing to consider.
Milk production has a significant impact on the global climate.
About 33 per cent of cropland is used to feed grazing animals including dairy
cattle Even though the carbon footprint of dairy products has declined since
1990, Dairy production is still responsible for 3 per cent of all greenhouse gas
emissions, even more than all aeroplanes combined.
Milk is a huge industry and sadly, most of its production in
factory farms causes incredible suffering. Cows are impregnated over and over,
separated from their young shortly after birth, and slaughtered once their
tortured bodies are not productive anymore. We can't ignore that much of the
milk we consume stems from an industry that is basically torture and
contributes to climate change.
What about Plant-Based Milk?
In terms of protein levels and nutritional value, only soy milk
can be compared to cow's milk. The others need to be artificially enriched to reach
similar levels of vitamins and calcium. So, they can be an alternative to milk.
And another option might be available soon.
Several startups have created non-animal milk that is
nutritionally identical to dairy milk, for example, through fermentation by
gene-modified bacteria. This lab-grown milk can even be turned into cheese,
something that plant-based alternatives struggle with because they lack casein
and whey protein, the key ingredients that give dairy its taste and structure.
The environmental impact is a different story though. Many milk
alternatives use significantly less energy, land and less water to produce so
they have a much lower environmental impact than animal milk.
If you are willing to produce the least possible negative impact on the planet, the best choice is whatever milk alternative is regional go for it. As with almost any topic milk is complicated. It's not harmful for the majority of the population and it's crucial for many people around the world.
It's good, nutritious food, but also harmful to the planet and causes a lot of suffering. We need to decide as a society how we want to deal with these facts.